Hard contact lenses alter accommodative gain but do not prevent refractive adaptation in chicks
This study compared the compensatory response to hyperopic defocus imposed on chicks in two different ways: (1) with-10 D spectacle lenses, and (2) with plano hard contact lens. The hyperopia seen with the contact lenses in situ was a consequence of their flat profile relative to the chick cornea, resulting in a negative fluid lens of approximately 16 D at day 2 and 9 D by day 10. This decrease with age reflects the corneal flattening that accompanies normal eye growth. By optically neutralizing the cornea, the contact lenses also had two other important effects: (1) a reduction in refractive astigmatism to almost negligible levels, and (2) a reduction in accommodative gain. The latter effect reflects the loss of the corneal component of the chick's accommodation and was estimated to be of the order of 40 to 57%, based on measurements made using topically applied nicotine to stimulate accommodation. Thus any estimate of the imposed hyperopic defocus based on accommodative effort required to overcome such errors will be too large. Chicks wearing either lens type on a continuous basis from hatching to 10 days only partially compensated for the imposed hyperopia through an increase in vitreous chamber growth. However, the effects were smaller in the spectacle lens group (e.g., a mean myopic shift of -4.1 +/- 2.3 D compared to -6.3 +/- 2.4 D for the contact lens group at day 10), although both groups experienced similar amounts of hyperopic defocus around day 10 (effective power of -10 D spectacle lens: -9.4 D). The changes seen in the spectacle lens group thus represent poorer compensation, i.e., 44 vs. 71% of the imposed error. However, overcompensation is the predicted effect, if any, of the accommodative deficit imposed on the contact lens group, and this was not seen. That compensation, albeit incomplete, occurred with the contact lens as well as the spectacle lens, suggests that neither accommodation nor astigmatism are fundamental cues for emmetropization as modeled here.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||The contents of this journal can be freely accessed online via the journal's web page (see link) 12 months after publication. For more information, please refer to the journal's website (see link) or contact the author. Author contact details: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Keywords:||Contact Lenses, Accommodation, Ocular/, physiology, Adaptation, Ocular/, physiology, Refractive Errors/, therapy, Animals, Anterior Eye Segment/pathology, Anterior Eye Segment/physiopathology, Chickens, Comparative Study, Follow, Up Studies, Male, Refractive Errors/pathology, Refractive Errors/physiopathology, Research Support, Non, U, S, Gov't, Visual Acuity|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health|
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 1997 Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins|
|Deposited On:||15 Jun 2006|
|Last Modified:||15 Jan 2009 17:04|
Repository Staff Only: item control page