QUT ePrints

Contrast and spatial-frequency requirements for emmetropization in chicks

Schmid, Katrina L. & Wildsoet, Christine F. (1997) Contrast and spatial-frequency requirements for emmetropization in chicks. Vision Research, 37(15), pp. 2011-2021.

View at publisher

Abstract

This study examined the contrast and spatial-frequency requirements for emmetropization in chicks. Chicks were form deprived from hatching either constantly or had this treatment interrupted with 20 min of "visual stimulation" each day. Visual stimulation comprised exposure to either a normal cage environment (i.e., normal vision) or environments that were restricted in either their spatial contrast or spatial-frequency composition. Constant form deprivation resulted in high myopia (e.g. -11.8 D after 5 days), with refractive changes being much smaller in chicks allowed 20 min of normal vision each day (e.g. -3.4D). The restricted contrast environments (contrast range: 9-78%) were generally only slightly less effective than the normal cage environment in preventing form-deprivation myopia. However, in the case of restricted spatial-frequency environments, both the intermediate (0.86 cycles deg-1) and mixed spatial-frequency environments significantly reduced the form deprivation response, while both the high (4.3 cycles deg-1) and low spatial-frequency (0.086 cycles deg-1) stimuli, as well as the composites of these, were less effective in preventing form-deprivation myopia. This spatial-frequency dependence did not vary when, instead of white light, monochromatic illumination was used to eliminate chromatic aberration, although all groups showed more myopia under this condition. It is assumed that the observed inhibitory effects on form-deprivation myopia reflect the adequacy of the visual information presented during the period of visual stimulation for emmetropization in chicks. In this context, the data imply a mid-spatial-frequency tuning in the current study and a low contrast threshold which was not reached for this emmetropization process. Finally, the data hint that chromatic aberration may have some role as a cue to defocus in emmetropization.

Impact and interest:

39 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™
36 citations in Web of Science®

Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 4184
Item Type: Journal Article
Additional Information: For more information, please refer to the journal’s website (see link) or contact the author. Author contact details: schmid.k@qut.edu.au
Keywords: Form Perception/, physiology, Vision/, physiology, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Chickens, Contrast Sensitivity, Eye/anatomy & histology, Light, Male, Myopia/etiology, Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology, Research Support, Non, U, S, Gov't, Sensory Deprivation
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00014-X
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Copyright Owner: Copyright 1997 Elsevier
Deposited On: 14 Jun 2006
Last Modified: 15 Jan 2009 17:04

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page