The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment : part 3 (Victoria)
Willmott, Lindy, White, Benjamin P., Parker, Malcolm, & Cartwright, Colleen (2011) The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment : part 3 (Victoria). Journal of Law and Medicine, 18(4), pp. 773-797.
This is the final article in a series of three that examines the legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment from adults who lack capacity. This article considers the position in Victoria. A review of the law in this State reveals that medical professionals play significant legal roles in these decisions. However, the law is problematic in a number of respects and this is likely to impede medical professionals’ legal knowledge in this area. The article examines the level of training that medical professionals receive on issues such as refusal of treatment certificates and substitute decision-making, and the available empirical evidence as to the state of medical professionals’ knowledge of the law at the end of life. It concludes that there are gaps in legal knowledge and that law reform is needed in Victoria. The article also draws together themes from the series as a whole, including conclusions about the need for more and better medical education and about law reform generally.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||This article was published with the standard QUT addendum re eprints usage.|
|Keywords:||End of life decision-making, Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment, Doctors' knowledge of the law, Doctors' compliance with the law, Adult guardianship, Substitute decision-making, Advance directives|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Access to Justice (180102)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Law and Society (180119)
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
Current > Research Centres > Law and Justice Research Centre
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters (Australia/NZ)|
|Deposited On:||07 Jun 2011 08:53|
|Last Modified:||11 Aug 2011 14:44|
Repository Staff Only: item control page