Queensland Court of Appeal opines on the meaning of 'material prejudice'
Dixon, William M. (2011) Queensland Court of Appeal opines on the meaning of 'material prejudice'. The Queensland Lawyer, 31(1), pp. 5-8.
The decision of Wilson J in Wilson v Mirvac Queensland Pty Ltd was the subject of an article in an earlier edition of this journal. At that time, it was foreshadowed that the decision was to be taken on appeal. The decision of the Court of Appeal in Mirvac Queensland Pty Ltd v Wilson is considered in this article.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Property Law, material prejudice, s 214 of the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld)|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Property Law (excl. Intellectual Property Law) (180124)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2011 Lawbook Company/Thomson Legal & Regulatory|
|Deposited On:||11 Jul 2011 14:32|
|Last Modified:||12 Jul 2011 05:34|
Repository Staff Only: item control page