Blur detection thresholds in childhood myopia: single and dual target presentation

Schmid, Katrian L., Iskander, D. Robert, Li, Roger W.H., Edwards, Marion H., & Lew, John K.F. (2002) Blur detection thresholds in childhood myopia: single and dual target presentation. Vision Research, 42(2), pp. 239-247.

View at publisher


There is some suggestion that the ability to detect blur may be altered in adults with myopia. Here, we address the question of whether children with myopia have worse blur detection than other children, and whether blur detection in myopic children is related to the rate of myopia progression. We recruited 20 myopes and 20 non-myopes aged between 8 and 12 years. Refractive errors, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity were measured and the change in refractive error over the past year calculated from clinic records. Blur detection thresholds for two different types of black and white targets (text and scenes), two illumination conditions and two testing protocols were determined using a computer-based forced-choice testing procedure. The two testing protocols used were: (i) dual image presentation where subjects were asked to choose the clearer of the two images, one image always having zero blur, and (ii) single image presentation in which the subject reported whether the image was clear or blurred. Blur discrimination ability under all tested conditions was similar for both refractive error groups. Blur detection thresholds were 0.27+/-0.15 D (myopes) and 0.24+/-0.07 D (non-myopes) for text images. Thresholds were similar when measured with a one log unit reduction in lighting: 0.27+/-0.31 D compared to 0.23+/-0.14 D. Blur detection thresholds were greater for photographic scenes (myopes 0.41+/-0.36 D, non-myopes 0.44+/-0.36 D) and when only a single text image (myopes 0.51+/-0.21 D, non-myopes 0.59+/-0.01 D) was presented, but this increase was measured in both refractive error groups. There was no correlation between blur thresholds and refractive error magnitude, refractive error progression over the past year, or contrast sensitivity. We found that the blur detection ability showed greater individual variation in myopic children. Further work is required to determine whether blur detection ability is of relevance to myopia development.

Impact and interest:

19 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™
18 citations in Web of Science®

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 4256
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Additional Information: For more information, please refer to the journal’s website (see link) or contact the author. Author contact details:
Keywords: Accommodation, Ocular, Myopia/, physiopathology, Child, Contrast Sensitivity, Discrimination (Psychology), Female, Humans, Male, Myopia/psychology, Photic Stimulation/methods, Psychophysics, Research Support, Non, U, S, Gov't, Sensory Thresholds, Visual Acuity
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00277-2
ISSN: 0042-6989
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2002 Elsevier
Deposited On: 14 Jun 2006 00:00
Last Modified: 10 Aug 2011 15:35

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page