QUT ePrints

The efficacy of final examinations: A comparative study of closed-book, invigilated exams and open-book, open-web exams

Williams, Jeremy & Wong, Amy (2009) The efficacy of final examinations: A comparative study of closed-book, invigilated exams and open-book, open-web exams. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), pp. 227-236.

View at publisher

Impact and interest:

6 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™
1 citations in Web of Science®

Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 42972
Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: Examinations , Assessment, Authentic, Open-book, Open-web
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00929.x
ISSN: 0007-1013
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > EDUCATION (130000)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > EDUCATION (130000) > SPECIALIST STUDIES IN EDUCATION (130300)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
Current > Schools > School of Economics & Finance
Deposited On: 13 Jul 2011 23:08
Last Modified: 03 Dec 2012 12:08

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page