Response to the Queensland R & D Strategy Issues Paper
Queensland’s R and D strategy articulates a strategy for research in the sciences and technology. It intent and purpose are excellent, but in its current form it poorly addresses R and D opportunities deriving from the applied social and the creative disciplines and the role of the social and creative disciplines in the development and commercialisation process for all research.
Proposed research expenditure priorities reflect a science/technology led agenda for Queensland at the expense of new economy imperatives for research in knowledge consumption services. The ‘knowledge consumption services’ sector derives from the applied social and creative disciplines (business, education, leisure and entertainment, media and communications) and represents 25% of exemplary economies, whilst the new science sector (agricultural biotech, fiber, construction materials, energy and pharmaceuticals) for example, accounts for only about 15% of these economies. In fact all modern economies are consumption driven (60-70% of GDP) and the social technologies that manage consumption all derive from the social and creative disciplines.
Knowledge consumption industries are not as research intensive as science based industries but historical research expenditure in Queensland has devoted only 3.7% to research in the applied social and creative disciplines and the currently proposed strategy does not significantly alter this allocation. Queensland can no longer afford to understand the social and creative disciplines as commercially irrelevant, ‘civilising’ disciplines. Instead they must be recognised as the vanguard of economic growth. In particular, the proposed R and D strategy does nothing to position Queensland for the emerging wave of innovation needed to meet demand for content creation in entertainment, education, government, and health information, to exploit universal networked broadband architectures currently in development.
Not only is research in the applied social and creative disciplines required for its own commercial potential, but also because such research must be hybridised with science and technology research to realise the commercial potential of the latter. Commercialisation depends on ‘whole product value propositions’ not just basic research. QUT’s proposed CRC for Interaction Design provides one example of how research in the social and creative disciplines can be meaningfully hybridised with basic research in technology, to create new commercial opportunities for Queensland.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Keywords:||creative industries, cultural industries, content industries, innovation policy, Queensland|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Creative Industries Faculty|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2002 (please consult author)|
|Deposited On:||28 Nov 2006 00:00|
|Last Modified:||09 Jun 2010 12:32|
Repository Staff Only: item control page