QUT ePrints

A Comparison of Client and Contractor Attitudes to Prequalification Criteria

Mills, Anthony & Skitmore, Martin (1999) A Comparison of Client and Contractor Attitudes to Prequalification Criteria. In Ogunlana, S. (Ed.) International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation (CIB) TG23 and W-92 Joint Symposium "Portable Partnering in Construction and Procurement", 25-28 January 1999, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Abstract

Contractor prequalification is concerned with assessing the likelihood of contractors meeting client and project requirements. The criteria used in this assessment have been developed in a largely idiosyncratic manner to date and with little or no consultation with the contractors affected. As a result, contractors are faced with a variety of calls for information by prequalifiers, the collection of which can be quite costly. This is leading to expensive duplication of effort by contractors in providing what is often similar information but in different formats. Furthermore, previous research has shown that the benefits of the information to prequalifiers are uncertain - many prequalifiers analyse the information in only a cursory manner. What is needed is some form of cost-benefit analysis to be carried out which will establish a common set of criteria for all to use.

As a precursor to this, the research described in this paper compares the different attitudes of both prequalifiers and contractors to prequalification criteria commonly in use in the Australian building industry. This was carried out via a postal questionnaire involving 49 contractors and 15 prequalifiers across Australia. The respondents were divided into three groups; (1) contractors doing work for mainly private sector clients and (2) contractors doing work for mainly private sector clients, and (3) construction prequalifiers (clients).

The results show that both clients and contractors have divergent opinions on the importance and value of the criteria in use. The possible reasons for these differences are discussed and the likely implications for future research in the topic.

Impact and interest:

1 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

903 since deposited on 19 Jun 2006
291 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 4508
Item Type: Conference Paper
Keywords: Benefits, costs, criteria, perceptions, prequalification, standardisation
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > BUILDING (120200) > Quantity Surveying (120203)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > BUILDING (120200)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > BUILDING (120200) > Building Construction Management and Project Planning (120201)
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering
Copyright Owner: Copyright 1999 (please consult author)
Deposited On: 19 Jun 2006
Last Modified: 11 Aug 2011 02:11

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page