Global modern food biotechnologies : risks and benefits of using an ethical matrix for participatory, holistic developments of policy and practice
Gesche, Astrid H. & Haslberger, Alexander (2005) Global modern food biotechnologies : risks and benefits of using an ethical matrix for participatory, holistic developments of policy and practice. In Gardiner, Dave & Scott, Katie (Eds.) United Nations/Queensland Government International Conference on Engaging Communities, 14-17 August 2005, Brisbane, QLD.
Sound science and regulatory measures in risk assessment appear to be insufficient to address the public’s disquiet regarding genetically modified foods. In response, international organizations such as the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations have begun to embrace a more holistic approach that now considers the scientific, regulatory and local requirements as well as the social and ethical impact of modern food biotechnologies.
One enduring difficulty in incorporating ethical and social issues in policy development has been its procedure. Of particular concern is the question of how to manage an exploration of often complex and controversial topics in such a way that the different voices and social and ethical norms of citizens and stakeholders are taken into account without unduly stifling or endangering good policy development and decision-making.
This paper discusses the benefits and risks of one emerging framework that can be constructed around four mutually supportive, universal ethical principles set out in an ethical matrix. A systematic approach can lead to deliberations that are rational and inclusive, while being at the same time open and collaborative. Such a framework might compare well with existing scientific risk management practices.
Taken together, an integration of both the scientific and the ethical-social could be of paramount importance for a modern food biotechnology that has global ambitions, but which can easily be fractured by local or social incompatibilities without public participation and support.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Conference Paper|
|Keywords:||Integrated Risk Assessment, Biotechnology, Ethical Matrix, Public Policy Development, Ethical Principles, Code of Ethics, Genetically Modified Food|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY (160000) > POLITICAL SCIENCE (160600)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES (220000) > APPLIED ETHICS (220100) > Applied Ethics not elsewhere classified (220199)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > TECHNOLOGY (100000) > MEDICAL BIOTECHNOLOGY (100400)
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Social Change Research|
Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > QUT Carseldine - Humanities & Human Services
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2005 The Authors|
|Deposited On:||02 Mar 2007|
|Last Modified:||11 Aug 2011 00:32|
Repository Staff Only: item control page