Peer state assessment of TxDOT maintenance program and practices : workshop and road rally findings

Gao, Lu, Chi, Seokho, Prozzi, Jorge, Yildirim, Yetkin, Zhang, Zhanmin, Centurion, Claudia, & Murphy, Mike (2011) Peer state assessment of TxDOT maintenance program and practices : workshop and road rally findings. Center for Transportation Research, Austin, Texas.

This is the latest version of this eprint.

[img] Published Version (PDF 1MB)
Available to QUT staff and students only | Request a copy from author


In an effort to evaluate and improve their practices to ensure the future excellence of the Texas highway system, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) sought a forum in which experts from other state departments of transportation could share their expertise. Thus, the Peer State Review of TxDOT Maintenance Practices project was organized and conducted for TxDOT by the Center for Transportation Research (CTR) at The University of Texas at Austin. The goal of the project was to conduct a workshop at CTR and in the Austin District that would educate the visiting peers on TxDOT’s maintenance practices and invite their feedback. CTR and TxDOT arranged the participation of the following directors of maintenance: Steve Takigawa, CA; Roy Rissky, KS; Eric Pitts, GA; Jim Carney, MO; Jennifer Brandenburg, NC; and David Bierschbach, WA. One of the means used to capture the peer reviewers’ opinions was a carefully designed booklet of 15 questions. The peers provided TxDOT with written responses to these questions, and the oral comments made during the workshop were also captured. This information was then compiled and summarized in the following report. An examination of the peers’ comments suggests that TxDOT should use a more holistic, statewide approach to funding and planning rather than funding and planning for each district separately. Additionally, the peers stressed the importance of allocating funds based on the actual conditions of the roadways instead of on inventory. The visiting directors of maintenance also recommended continuing and proliferating programs that enhance communication, such as peer review workshops.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 46263
Item Type: Report
Refereed: No
Additional Information: Distribution Statement:
No restrictions. This document is available to the
public through the National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161;
Additional URLs:
Keywords: Pavement, Roadside, Traffic Operations, Maintenance, Maintenance Peer Review, Peer Review, Road Rally, Maintenance Planning, Maintenance Budget; Maintenance Treatments; Pavement Management Information System, PMIS, TxMAP, TxTAP, TxCAP, Maintenance Pro
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING (120500) > Transport Planning (120506)
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering
Past > Schools > School of Urban Development
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2011 Center for Transportation Research
The University of Texas at Austin
Deposited On: 29 Sep 2011 23:20
Last Modified: 12 Sep 2013 02:32

Available Versions of this Item

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page