Caveat today gone tomorrow : Applying to the Supreme Court to Remove a Caveat
McEniery, Benjamin J. & Downes, Kylie (2011) Caveat today gone tomorrow : Applying to the Supreme Court to Remove a Caveat. Proctor, pp. 42-44.
While there are many reasons why a client may seek removal of a caveat (which retains an interest in land or water allocation), the procedures involved require careful adherence.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2011 Ben McEniery and Kylie Downes|
|Deposited On:||03 Nov 2011 11:13|
|Last Modified:||03 Nov 2011 11:13|
Repository Staff Only: item control page