District Court debt decisions
Jackson, Sheryl (2011) District Court debt decisions. Proctor, 31(4), pp. 50-51.
This article examines the distinction between a "liquidated demand" and a claim for "unliquidated damages" and the implications of that distinction on the procedure for obtaining a judgment if the defendant fails to file a notice of intention to defend.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||liquidated demand, unliquidated damages, default judgment, practice and procedure, Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 284|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Research Centres > Law and Justice Research Centre
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2011 Queensland Law Society Inc|
|Deposited On:||23 Jan 2012 23:24|
|Last Modified:||24 Jan 2012 21:17|
Repository Staff Only: item control page