Devil's in the detail : judgment highlights need for invoice transparency

Jackson, Sheryl (2011) Devil's in the detail : judgment highlights need for invoice transparency. Proctor, 31(5), pp. 46-47.

View at publisher


This article considers the implications of the decision in Clayton Utz Lawyers v P & W Enterprises Pty Ltd [2011] QDC 5, and the meaning of "itemised bill" as defined in the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld).

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

505 since deposited on 24 Jan 2012
120 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 48196
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: Legal Profession Act 2007, itemised bill, Clayton Utz v P & W Enterprises, Practice and Procedure
ISSN: 1321-8794
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2011 the author.
Deposited On: 24 Jan 2012 00:02
Last Modified: 24 Jan 2012 21:31

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page