Devil's in the detail : judgment highlights need for invoice transparency
Jackson, Sheryl (2011) Devil's in the detail : judgment highlights need for invoice transparency. Proctor, 31(5), pp. 46-47.
Abstract
This article considers the implications of the decision in Clayton Utz Lawyers v P & W Enterprises Pty Ltd [2011] QDC 5, and the meaning of "itemised bill" as defined in the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld).
Citations:
Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
| ID Code: | 48196 |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
| Keywords: | Legal Profession Act 2007, itemised bill, Clayton Utz v P & W Enterprises, Practice and Procedure |
| ISSN: | 1321-8794 |
| Subjects: | Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123) |
| Divisions: | Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law Current > Schools > School of Law |
| Copyright Owner: | Copyright 2011 the author. |
| Deposited On: | 24 Jan 2012 10:02 |
| Last Modified: | 25 Jan 2012 07:31 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page