Devil's in the detail : judgment highlights need for invoice transparency
Jackson, Sheryl (2011) Devil's in the detail : judgment highlights need for invoice transparency. Proctor, 31(5), pp. 46-47.
This article considers the implications of the decision in Clayton Utz Lawyers v P & W Enterprises Pty Ltd  QDC 5, and the meaning of "itemised bill" as defined in the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld).
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Legal Profession Act 2007, itemised bill, Clayton Utz v P & W Enterprises, Practice and Procedure|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2011 the author.|
|Deposited On:||24 Jan 2012 00:02|
|Last Modified:||24 Jan 2012 21:31|
Repository Staff Only: item control page