Interim bills and costs assessment : was the application in or out of time?
Jackson, Sheryl (2011) Interim bills and costs assessment : was the application in or out of time? Proctor, 31(8), pp. 46-47.
This article examines the decision in Turner v Mitchells Solicitors  QDC 61 and the issue whether an application for assessment of costs under an interim bill at the time of a final bill is subject to the usual 12-month restriction.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||costs , interim bills, Legal Profession Act s 333, Legal Profession Act s 335, final bills|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2011 Sheryl Jackson|
|Deposited On:||24 Jan 2012 00:44|
|Last Modified:||24 Jan 2012 00:44|
Repository Staff Only: item control page