Ecological Validity, Representative Design, and Correspondence Between Experimental Task Constraints and Behavioral Setting: Comment on Rogers, Kadar, and Costall (2005)
Araujo, Duarte, Davids, Keith W., & Passos, Pedro (2007) Ecological Validity, Representative Design, and Correspondence Between Experimental Task Constraints and Behavioral Setting: Comment on Rogers, Kadar, and Costall (2005). Ecological Psychology, 19(1), pp. 69-78.
Using the term "ecological validity", in a recent issue of Ecological Psychology, Rogers et al. (2005) discussed how the simulator they used could provide data by replicating natural road driving behaviors. However, ecological validity, as Egon Brunswik (1956) conceived it, refers to the validity of a cue (i.e., perceptual variable) in predicting a criterion state of the environment. Like other psychologists in the past, Rogers et al. (2005) confused this term with another of Brunswik’s terms: representative design. In this comment we clarify the distinction between these concepts and also discuss how Gibsonian ideas can strengthen understanding of the correspondence between experimental task constraints and behavioral settings outside the laboratory. The main implication of this theoretical rationalization is for the development of a measurable correspondence between experimental and behavioural contexts, enabling defensible generalization to both organisms and environments beyond the bounds of particular experiments.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2007 Taylor & Francis|
|Copyright Statement:||This is an electronic version of an article published in [Ecological Psychology 19(1):pp. 69-78.]. [Ecological Psychology] is available online at informaworldTM.|
|Deposited On:||01 Sep 2006 00:00|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 13:37|
Repository Staff Only: item control page