Civil applications in the Magistrates Court are often set down for hearing by a judicial registrar, but there is now some uncertainty on the limitation of this practice
Jackson, Sheryl & Ditton, Justin (2010) Civil applications in the Magistrates Court are often set down for hearing by a judicial registrar, but there is now some uncertainty on the limitation of this practice. Proctor, 30(11), pp. 52-53.
The decision of the District Court of Queensland in Mark Treherne & Associates -v- Murray David Hopkins  QDC 36 will have particular relevance for early career lawyers. This decision raises questions about the limits of the jurisdiction of judicial registrars in the Magistrates Court.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Jurisdiction of Judicial Registrars, Mark Treherne & Associates v Hopkins, Magistrates Act 1991 s 53J|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2010 Queensland Law Society|
|Deposited On:||01 Feb 2012 01:19|
|Last Modified:||12 Apr 2013 04:46|
Repository Staff Only: item control page