QUT ePrints

Determining the appropriate proportion of owner-provided design in design-build contracts - a content analysis approach

Xia, Bo, Chan, Albert, Molenaar, Keith, & Skitmore, Martin (2012) Determining the appropriate proportion of owner-provided design in design-build contracts - a content analysis approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(9), pp. 1017-1022.

View at publisher

Abstract

The Request For Proposal (RFP) with the design‐build (DB) procurement arrangement is a document in which an owner develops his requirements and conveys the project scope to DB contractors. Owners should provide an appropriate level of design in DB RFPs to adequately describe their requirements without compromising the prospects for innovation. This paper examines and compares the different levels of owner‐provided design in DB RFPs by the content analysis of 84 requests for RFPs for public DB projects advertised between 2000 and 2010 with an aggregate contract value of over $5.4 billion. A statistical analysis was also conducted in order to explore the relationship between the proportion of owner‐provided design and other project information, including project type, advertisement time, project size, contractor selection method, procurement process and contract type. The results show that the majority (64.8%) of the RFPs provide less than 10% of the owner‐provided design. The owner‐provided design proportion has a significant association with project type, project size, contractor selection method and contract type. In addition, owners are generally providing less design in recent years than hitherto. The research findings also provide owners with perspectives to determine the appropriate level of owner‐provided design in DB RFPs.

Impact and interest:

2 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

44 since deposited on 05 Feb 2012
24 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 48436
Item Type: Journal Article
Additional URLs:
Keywords: Design and build, Request For Proposals, content analysis, owner‐provided design proportion
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000522
ISSN: 0733-9364 (online) 1943-7862 (print)
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > BUILDING (120200) > Building Construction Management and Project Planning (120201)
Divisions: Current > Schools > School of Civil Engineering & Built Environment
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Science & Engineering Faculty
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Deposited On: 06 Feb 2012 08:55
Last Modified: 14 Mar 2013 10:47

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page