Peer state assessment of TxDOT maintenance program and practices, part I : workshop findings and recommendations
Chi, Seokho, Gao, Lu , Murphy, Mike , Zhang, Zhanmin , Prozzi, Jorge , Sims, Tammy , & Yildirim, Yetkin (2012) Peer state assessment of TxDOT maintenance program and practices, part I : workshop findings and recommendations. In Transportation Research Board (TRB) 91st Annual Meeting, 22-26 Jan 2012, Marriott Wardman Park, Washington, D.C..
This is the latest version of this eprint.
|Accepted Version (PDF 117kB) |
Administrators only | Request a copy from author
To assess and improve their practices, and thus ensure the future excellence of the Texas highway system, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) sought a forum in which experts from other State Departments of Transportation could evaluate the TxDOT maintenance program and practices based on their expertise. To meet this need, a Peer State Review of TxDOT Maintenance Practices project was organized and conducted by the Center for Transportation Research (CTR) at The University of Texas at Austin. CTR researchers, along with TxDOT staff, conducted a workshop to present TxDOT’s maintenance practices to the visiting peer reviewers and invite their feedback. Directors of maintenance from six different states—California, Kansas, Georgia, Missouri, North Carolina, and Washington—participated in the workshop. CTR and TxDOT worked together to design a questionnaire with 15 key questions to capture the peers’ opinions on maintenance program and practices. This paper compiles and summarizes this information. The examination results suggested that TxDOT should use a more state-wide approach to funding and planning, in addition to funding and planning for each district separately. Additionally, the peers recommended that criteria such as condition and level of service of the roadways be given greater weight in the funding allocation than lane miles or vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The Peer Reviewers also determined that TxDOT maintenance employee experience and communications were strong assets. Additional strengths included the willingness of TxDOT to invite peer reviews of their practices and a willingness to consider opportunities for improvement.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Conference Paper|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > TRANSPORTATION AND FREIGHT SERVICES (150700) > Road Transportation and Freight Services (150703)|
|Divisions:||Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering|
Past > Schools > School of Urban Development
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2011 Please consult the authors.|
|Deposited On:||07 Feb 2012 08:04|
|Last Modified:||24 Jul 2013 16:11|
Available Versions of this Item
- Peer State Assessment of TxDOT Maintenance Program and Practices, Part I : Workshop Findings and Recommendations. (deposited 21 Oct 2011 12:48)
- Peer state assessment of TxDOT maintenance program and practices, part I : workshop findings and recommendations. (deposited 07 Feb 2012 08:04)[Currently Displayed]
Repository Staff Only: item control page