A systematic review : the effects of orientation programs for cancer patients and their family/carers
Chan, Raymond, Webster, Joan, & Marquart, Louise (2012) A systematic review : the effects of orientation programs for cancer patients and their family/carers. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(12), pp. 1558-1567.
|Accepted Version (PDF 177kB) |
Administrators only until December 2013 | Request a copy from author
To assess the effects of information interventions which orient patients and their carers/family to a cancer care facility and the services available within the facility.
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs and quasi-RCTs.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
We included studies evaluating the effect of an orientation intervention, compared with a control group which received usual care, or with trials comparing one orientation intervention with another orientation intervention.
Four RCTs of 610 participants met the criteria for inclusion. Findings from two RCTs demonstrated significant benefits of the orientation intervention in relation to reduced levels of distress (mean difference (MD): −8.96, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): −11.79 to −6.13), but non-significant benefits in relation to the levels state anxiety levels (MD −9.77) (95%CI: −24.96 to 5.41). There are insufficient data on the other outcomes of interest.
This review has demonstrated the feasibility and some potential benefits of orientation interventions. There was a low level of evidence to suggest that orientation interventions can reduce distress in patients. However, other outcomes, including patient knowledge recall/satisfaction, remain inconclusive. The majority of trials were subjected to high risk of bias and were likely to be insufficiently powered. Further well conducted and powered RCTs are required to provide evidence for determining the most appropriate intensity, nature, mode and resources for such interventions. Patient and carer-focused outcomes should be included.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Cancer patients, Cancer care services, Meta-analysis, Orientation programs, Patient education, Structured information giving, Family, Carers|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > NURSING (111000) > Clinical Nursing - Secondary (Acute Care) (111003)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > ONCOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS (111200)
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health|
Current > Schools > School of Nursing
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2012 Elsevier Ltd.|
|Copyright Statement:||NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Nursing Studies. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(12), 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.03.002|
|Deposited On:||04 Apr 2012 12:25|
|Last Modified:||18 Sep 2013 20:44|
Repository Staff Only: item control page