QUT ePrints

Rational avoidance of accountability

Lauchs, Mark A. (2007) Rational avoidance of accountability. In AAPAE 2007, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.

[img] Accepted Version (PDF 86kB)
Administrators only | Request a copy from author
    [img] Scholarly Evidence (PDF 290kB)
    Administrators only | Request a copy from author

      Abstract

      Anthony Downs public choice theory proposes that every rational person would try to meet their own desires in preference to those of others, and that such rational persons would attempt to obtain these desires in the most efficient manner possible. This paper will demonstrate that the application of this theory would mean that public servants and politicians would perform acts of corruption and maladministration in order to efficiently meet their desires. As such action is unavoidable, political parties must appear to meet the public demand for accountability systems, but must not make these systems viable lest they expose the corruption and maladministration that would threaten the government’s chance or re-election. It is therefore logical for governments to display a commitment for accountability whilst simultaneously ensuring the systems would not be able to interfere with government control or expose its flaws.

      Impact and interest:

      Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

      These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

      Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

      ID Code: 50147
      Item Type: Conference Paper
      Keywords: corruption, public administration, accountability
      Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY (160000) > POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION (160500) > Public Administration (160509)
      Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
      Current > Schools > School of Justice
      Deposited On: 08 May 2012 10:03
      Last Modified: 28 Jun 2012 10:08

      Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

      Repository Staff Only: item control page