QUT ePrints

Autonomy versus futility? Barriers to good clinical practice in end-of-life care : a Queensland case

Lawrence, Sean, Willmott, Lindy, Miligan, Eleanor, Winch, Sarah, White, Benjamin P., & Parker, Malcolm (2012) Autonomy versus futility? Barriers to good clinical practice in end-of-life care : a Queensland case. Medical Journal of Australia, 196(6), pp. 404-405.

View at publisher (open access)

Abstract

Findings from a Queensland coronial inquest highlight the complex clinical, ethical and legal issues that arise in end-of-life care when clinicians and family members disagree about a diagnosis of clinical futility.

The tension between the law and best medical practice is highlighted in this case, as doctors are compelled to seek family consent to not commence a futile intervention.

Good communication between doctors and families, as well as community and professional education, is essential to resolve tensions that can arise when there is disagreement about treatment at the end of life.

Impact and interest:

8 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™
6 citations in Web of Science®

Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

407 since deposited on 14 May 2012
155 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 50303
Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: Medical futility, End of life decision-making, Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, Adult guardianship law, Health communication, Medical ethics, Health law
DOI: 10.5694/mja10.10969
ISSN: 0025-729X
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > CLINICAL SCIENCES (110300) > Intensive Care (110310)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Law and Society (180119)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Research Centres > Law and Justice Research Centre
Current > Schools > School of Law
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2012 Please consult the authors.
Deposited On: 15 May 2012 08:50
Last Modified: 17 May 2012 20:37

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page