Non-party disclosure - UCPR r 242(2)
Jackson, Sheryl (2008) Non-party disclosure - UCPR r 242(2). Proctor, 28(5), pp. 54-55.
Administrators only | Request a copy from author
In TSPD Pty Ltd v Resortrez Pty Ltd  QSC 001 Fryberg J made an order permitting the applicant to inspect and copy documents which had been produced to the court under a subpoena, but had remained in the registry.
Though not essential to the decision the judgment contains some interesting discussion about the construction of r 242 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) (UCPR).
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) r 242(2), non-party disclosure, relevance of forensic purpose of notice under r242(1), subpoena for production of documents|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2008 the author.|
|Deposited On:||16 Jul 2012 05:13|
|Last Modified:||05 Sep 2012 07:20|
Repository Staff Only: item control page