Non-party disclosure - UCPR r 242(2)
Jackson, Sheryl (2008) Non-party disclosure - UCPR r 242(2). Proctor, 28(5), pp. 54-55.
|Scholarly Evidence (PDF 71Kb) |
Administrators only | Request a copy from author
In TSPD Pty Ltd v Resortrez Pty Ltd  QSC 001 Fryberg J made an order permitting the applicant to inspect and copy documents which had been produced to the court under a subpoena, but had remained in the registry.
Though not essential to the decision the judgment contains some interesting discussion about the construction of r 242 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) (UCPR).
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) r 242(2), non-party disclosure, relevance of forensic purpose of notice under r242(1), subpoena for production of documents|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2008 the author.|
|Deposited On:||16 Jul 2012 15:13|
|Last Modified:||05 Sep 2012 17:20|
Repository Staff Only: item control page