Pleading for privilege : Denials and non-admissions under the UCPR
Jackson, Sheryl (2012) Pleading for privilege : Denials and non-admissions under the UCPR. Proctor, 32(8), pp. 38-40.
The decision in ASIC v Managed Investments Ltd No 3  QSC 74 provides practitioners with useful guidance on the relationship between the privileges against self-incrimination and exposure to a penalty, and the UCPR requirements for denials and non-admissions.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||pleading privilege, self-incrimination privilege, penalty privilege, denials and non-admissions|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2012 The author.|
|Deposited On:||03 Oct 2012 10:16|
|Last Modified:||04 Feb 2013 12:39|
Repository Staff Only: item control page