Pleading for privilege : Denials and non-admissions under the UCPR
Jackson, Sheryl (2012) Pleading for privilege : Denials and non-admissions under the UCPR. Proctor, 32(8), pp. 38-40.
The decision in ASIC v Managed Investments Ltd No 3  QSC 74 provides practitioners with useful guidance on the relationship between the privileges against self-incrimination and exposure to a penalty, and the UCPR requirements for denials and non-admissions.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||pleading privilege, self-incrimination privilege, penalty privilege, denials and non-admissions|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2012 The author.|
|Deposited On:||03 Oct 2012 00:16|
|Last Modified:||04 Feb 2013 02:39|
Repository Staff Only: item control page