Advanced practice nursing role development : factor analysis of a modified role delineation tool

Chang, Anne M., Gardner, Glenn E., & Duffield , Christine (2012) Advanced practice nursing role development : factor analysis of a modified role delineation tool. Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 68(6), pp. 1369-1379.

View at publisher



his study reports the use of exploratory factor analysis to determine construct validity of a modified advanced practice role delineation tool.


Little research exists on specific activities and domains of practice within advanced practice nursing roles, making it difficult to define service parameters of this level of nursing practice. A valid and reliable tool would assist those responsible for employing or deploying advanced practice nurses by identifying and defining their service profile. This is the third paper from a multi-phase Australian study aimed at assigning advanced practice roles.


A postal survey was conducted of a random sample of state government employed Registered nurses and midwives, across various levels and grades of practice in the state of Queensland, Australia, using the modified Advanced Practice Role Delineation tool. Exploratory factor analysis, using principal axis factoring was undertaken to examine factors in the modified tool. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient determined reliability of the overall scale and identified factors.


There were 658 responses (42% response rate). The five factors found with loadings of ≥.400 for 40 of the 41 APN activities were similar to the five domains in the Strong model. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was .94 overall and for the factors ranged from 0.83 to 0.95.


Exploratory factor analysis of the modified tool supports validity of the five domains of the original tool. Further investigation will identify use of the tool in a broader healthcare environment.

Impact and interest:

9 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™
6 citations in Web of Science®

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

333 since deposited on 27 Mar 2013
100 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 58679
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: Practice Nursing, , factor analysis,, nurse’s role,, instrument development, reliability and validity,
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05850.x
ISSN: 1365-2648
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > NURSING (111000) > Nursing not elsewhere classified (111099)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Nursing
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Deposited On: 27 Mar 2013 04:12
Last Modified: 12 Feb 2014 14:01

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page