Trial by jury in civil proceedings : “convenience” and the philosophy of the UCPR
Jackson, Sheryl (2008) Trial by jury in civil proceedings : “convenience” and the philosophy of the UCPR. Proctor, 28(7), pp. 56-58.
In Syddall v National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Limited  QSC 101 Daubney J ordered the action be tried without a jury. His judgment considered the circumstances in which a trial involves any technical, scientific or other issue that can not be “conveniently” considered and resolved by a jury as provided in r 474 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld)
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||trial without jury, when issue can not be "conveniently" resolved by jury, UCPR r474|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2008 Sheryl Jackson|
|Deposited On:||04 Apr 2013 22:43|
|Last Modified:||24 Jul 2013 06:23|
Repository Staff Only: item control page