Thinking by young children during argumentation: Use of evidence and logic
Diezmann, Carmel M. & Watters, James J. (1998) Thinking by young children during argumentation: Use of evidence and logic. In Ling, Q.M. & Kam, H.W. (Eds.) Thinking processes: Going beyond the surface curriculum, Simon and Schuster (Singapore), Singapore, pp. 115-134.
In an enrichment program for 5-7 year old children, the topic of colonisation of Mars was explored. The program was run over a 10 week period with the children meeting for 90 minutes each week. During the program the children were introduced to the topic through a range of experiences, sources of information and activities which encouraged them to develop an understanding of conditions on the planet. As part of these activities discussions and argument were undertaken about topical issues. Analyses of these discussions revealed several interesting features that have implications for teaching thinking and for science education. In particular it was noted that: (a) information from a range of sources were encoded without reference to the credibility of the sources, (b) children displayed high levels of logical and conditional reasoning exemplified through argument and, (c) although beliefs and alternative viewpoints were confronted and evaluated during discussions, revision of original beliefs was rare. These results imply that the children are able to apply domain general reasoning strategies in argumentation but the scientific validity of the arguments are constrained by the domain specific prior knowledge. However, the context of the program facilitated argument and engagement in reasoning processes by its appeal to personal interest. The motivational component of the learning experience became a significant force in sustaining the engagement in reasoning. This paper will explore the processes exhibited during this program and draw implications for teaching thinking strategies in classroom situations. Indeed, our experiences with these children challenges the border between traditional teaching and children’s capacity to reason.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Conference Paper|
|Keywords:||early childhood, young children, argumentation, thinking, evidence, logic|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Education|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 1998 (please consult author)|
|Deposited On:||01 Nov 2007|
|Last Modified:||03 Mar 2011 15:41|
Repository Staff Only: item control page