Environmental Distinctions: The discriminating dining environment
Smith, Dianne J. (2005) Environmental Distinctions: The discriminating dining environment. Les CAHIERS du CICLas, October(6), pp. 55-73.
How a cafe or restaurant is experienced is different from how the cafe is largely discussed in the media, that is, as an objectified physical setting. The distinction between physical settings and architectural experience was explored through an investigation of dining environments located in Paris and in an inner suburb in Brisbane, Australia. It was noted that the previous discussions of social and cultural practices had given little consideration to the influence of the environment on interpretation. Instead, the dining environment was discussed as a site for action, or as a three dimensional sculpture removed from habitation, and represented in design magazines through photographs which were usually devoid of people. Even fewer journals included the built environment (in an architectural sense) in the discussion of social acts. The environmental situation was often simply discussed as objects in a setting. Little attention had been given to the inherent potency of space, and the way in which objects and people influence and construct a sense of place. Everyday practices involve both the setting—or the sculptural space—and the activity or practice. In this study, the dining experience was shown to come into existence through the combination of these aspects—neither being able to represent the experience alone. The interior volume was not understood as emptiness filled with things but, rather, as a dynamic part of being-in-place. The space, when understood in this way, cannot exist without the person and vice versa. As a consequence, questions of identity and discrimination were raised, and examples of the role of the built environment in our interpretation of ‘the other’ were revealed.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||design, architectural experience, discrimination, grounded theory, narrative inquiry|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > ARCHITECTURE (120100) > Interior Design (120106)|
|Divisions:||Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2005 Universite Dauphine|
|Deposited On:||15 Feb 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 13:17|
Repository Staff Only: item control page