Honesty about adverse event : more honoured in the breach than in the observance?
Part of the chapter: "Sale of Sperm, Health Records, Minimally Conscious States, and Duties of Candour"
Although ethical obligations and good medical practice guidelines clearly contemplate open disclosure, there is a dearth of authority as to the nature and extent of a legal duty on Australian doctors to disclose adverse events to patients.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||Special issue for "Symposium: Donation of Stem Cells and Reproductive Tissue"|
|Keywords:||duty of candour, adverse events disclosure, medical negligence, open disclosure, good medical practice|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Tort Law (180126)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Deposited On:||22 Aug 2013 22:06|
|Last Modified:||29 Nov 2013 00:36|
Repository Staff Only: item control page