"Convincing the Policy Makers that Mediation is Often an Inappropriate Dispute Resolution Process for Women: A Case of Being Seen But Not Heard"

Field, Rachael M. (2001) "Convincing the Policy Makers that Mediation is Often an Inappropriate Dispute Resolution Process for Women: A Case of Being Seen But Not Heard". National Law Review.

Abstract

The disadvantages that exist for women participants in mediation have now been acknowledged for some time. Hilary Astor’s 1991 position paper for the National Committee on Violence Against Women was thorough and clear. Power imbalances make mediation a potentially unjust dispute resolution process for women, and one of the most crucial indicators of a serious power imbalance is a history of violence. Yet in the year 2000 mediation is still touted as a more humane and appropriate dispute resolution process than litigation, particularly for family disputes. This paper considers the implications for women of policy imperatives to encourage the use of mediation in family matters. It reiterates the reasons why women, and particularly women survivors of violence, should never be forced to participate in the process and queries how we can better encourage policy makers to act on the knowledge that for women informal justice is often no justice at all.

Impact and interest:

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

864 since deposited on 22 Feb 2007
55 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 6267
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Additional URLs:
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2001 LawNow
Copyright Statement: The contents of this journal can be freely accessed online via the journal’s web page (see link).
Deposited On: 22 Feb 2007 00:00
Last Modified: 09 Jun 2010 12:37

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page