Using the feminist critique of mediation to explore "the good, the bad and the ugly" implications for women of the introduction of mandatory family dispute resolution in Australia
Field, Rachael M. (2006) Using the feminist critique of mediation to explore "the good, the bad and the ugly" implications for women of the introduction of mandatory family dispute resolution in Australia. Australian Journal of Family Law, 20(5), pp. 45-78.
In this article, aspects of the feminist critique are used to analyse issues arising for women as a result of the introduction in Australia in 2006 of, what is in effect, mandatory family dispute resolution in children’s disputes. The article argues that whilst family dispute resolution can be a positive process for women, it can also be an environment in which women face significant disadvantages. These potential disadvantages mean that mandating family dispute resolution, as a process of first resort in children’s disputes, will potentially create great post-separation injustice for women, and consequently for many children (an important consideration given the heavy emphasis on the best-interests of the children that dominates rhetoric about the Bill).
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2006 Lexis Nexis|
|Copyright Statement:||Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.|
|Deposited On:||04 Oct 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:23|
Repository Staff Only: item control page