Dual vigilance task: Tracking changes in vigilance as a function of changes in monotonous contexts
Meuter, Renata F., Rakotonirainy, Andry, Johns, Bronwyn, Tran, Phillip, & Wagner, Phillipa J. (2006) Dual vigilance task: Tracking changes in vigilance as a function of changes in monotonous contexts. In International Conference on Fatigue Management in Transportation Operations, 11-15 September 2005, Seattle, USA, 11-15 September 2005, Seattle, USA.
We aimed to track changes in vigilance resulting from performing under conditions with varied levels of monotony and task demand. Accordingly task monotony and task demand were manipulated experimentally in a dual vigilance task. The central task required quick key presses to visually presented digits and the withholding of responses to an unpredictably occurring target digit. Non-monotonous and monotonous contexts were characterized by a high (p = 0.50) and a low target probability (p = 0.11) respectively. A second, peripheral task was introduced simultaneously, consisting of a moving circle that changed color unpredictably (p = 0.11). In addition to performing the central task, participants were asked to either ignore the circle's color change or to signal it by pressing a key. Response times and errors were recorded. As predicted, while performance in monotonous contexts was significantly faster overall, the requirement to respond also to a peripheral task significantly delayed responses. Dual task performance increased error rates overall (especially incorrectly withheld responses) but markedly so only in the monotonous context. Importantly, these performance decrements in monotonous contexts were observed on tasks that took less than 5 minutes to complete. It is concluded that changes in vigilance and consequent reduced performance can be traced as a function of context and task demands, independently of time on task. The implications of the dual vigilance task as a diagnostic tool are discussed.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Conference Paper|
|Keywords:||monotony, vigilance, dual task, driving, Likert Scale|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES (170000) > PSYCHOLOGY (170100) > Sensory Processes Perception and Performance (170112)|
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Accident Research & Road Safety - Qld (CARRS-Q)
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2006 (The authors)|
|Deposited On:||02 Apr 2007|
|Last Modified:||09 Jun 2010 12:37|
Repository Staff Only: item control page