Grant v Commissioner of Patents — the introduction of a physicality requirement into Australian patent law
McEniery, Benjamin J. (2006) Grant v Commissioner of Patents — the introduction of a physicality requirement into Australian patent law. Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 12(8), N−193-N−194.
The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia has for the first time considered the patentability of a pure business method, being one that does not incorporate a physical device, in Grant v Commissioner of Patents.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||For more information, please refer to the journal’s website (link above) or contact the author email@example.com|
|Keywords:||Patents, Patentability, Patentable Subject Matter, Physicality, Physical Aspect, Grant, Grant v Commissioner of Patents|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2007 Benjamin McEniery|
|Deposited On:||13 Mar 2007 00:00|
|Last Modified:||09 Jun 2010 12:38|
Repository Staff Only: item control page