Does Virtual Prototyping Kill the Potential for Disruptive Innovation?
Thomond, Pete & Jacobs, Joanne (2007) Does Virtual Prototyping Kill the Potential for Disruptive Innovation? In Fourth AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange, February 6-9 2007, Brisbane, Australia. (Unpublished)
A critical element of a corporate entrepreneur’s opportunity evaluation process will involve the attempt to understand customer requirements in order to calculate commercial demand. Traditional opportunity evaluation processes are less effective in the face of potentially disruptive innovations, as customers lack understanding and are unable to articulate their needs. Physical prototyping emerged as a method to test novel concepts in both familiar and unfamiliar markets; today, virtual prototyping is fast growing into this role in favour of the slower and more expensive production of physical models. Yet, anecdotal evidence suggests that virtual prototyping systems compromise the valuation of opportunities with disruptive potential. We address the need for empirical analysis with an experimental design in which we evaluate customer reactions to a potentially disruptive innovation in the mobile telecommunications sector. Our findings contribute evidence to suggest virtual prototypes are significantly less effective than physical prototypes at eliciting a deep customer understanding of potentially disruptive innovations. This work has repercussions for theory and for corporate entrepreneurs tasked with driving the disruptive potential of their firms.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
Repository Staff Only: item control page