Australasian trends in intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation weaning: results of a postal survey
Lewis, Peter A., Mullany, Daniel V., Courtney, Mary D., & Coyer, Fiona M. (2006) Australasian trends in intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation weaning: results of a postal survey. Critical Care and Resuscitation, 8(4), pp. 361-367.
|PDF (63kB) |
Objective: This study sought to generate baseline data describing Australasian intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) weaning practice. Methods: A questionnaire survey was mailed to all 192 Australasian intensive care units (ICU). Results: Response rate was 60% (n=116). The majority of hospitals informing practice were government funded public hospitals (65%), had between 100 and 500 beds (69%) and treated a minimum of 11 patients per annum with IABP (60%). The most common method of IABP support withdrawal was ratio reduction only (61%). Units most likely to undertake ratio weaning were higher end users of IABP (>21 per annum) (p=0.04). Other weaning practices involved a combination of ratio followed by volume (17%), volume then ratio (11%) and volume only (4%). Approaching statistical significance, ratio reduction weaning less frequently required IABP reinsertion or inotropic increase post balloon removal (p=0.068). Those units with documented weaning policies were less likely to require reinsertion or inotropic increase post removal (p=0.06). Criteria of importance prior to IABP weaning or removal were: blood pressure (92%); heart rate (76%); pulmonary artery wedge pressure (59%); noradrenaline dose (78%); adrenaline dose (57%); and dobutamine dose (57%). Pharmacologic escalation post balloon removal was reported between 2 and 10% by 90% of units. Balloon reinsertion was 2% or less for 87% of units. Conclusions: The Australasian approach to IABP weaning is eclectic. While ratio reduction weaning appears the most successful manner of support withdrawal, it may be a consequence of a volume outcome relationship with high end users yielding improved results through IABP familiarity.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||Self-archiving of the author-version is not yet supported by this publisher. For more information, please refer to the journal’s website (see hypertext link) or contact the author. Author contact details: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Keywords:||assisted circulation, cardiac output, low, shock, myocardial ischaemia, thoracic surgery, questionnaires|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE AND HAEMATOLOGY (110200) > Cardiology (incl. Cardiovascular Diseases) (110201)|
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Health Research|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2006 Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine|
|Deposited On:||04 Apr 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:27|
Repository Staff Only: item control page