Trauma, coping resources, and family functioning in emergency service personnel: a comparative study

Abstract

In the present study a sample of male, shift-working, operational ambulance officers, were compared to a group of male shift-workers from a range of occupations in which exposure to traumatic events is not inherent in the role (N=71). Three dimensions of family functioning were examined: intimacy, conflict, and parenting styles, with respect to occupation type (i.e., work-related exposure to trauma) and accounting for personal resources (coping). Personal resources were found to elicit a significant impact on the dimensions of family functioning. Furthermore, differences emerged in the pattern of coping between the two groups. Ambulance officers demonstrated a more varied repertoire of personal resources than the control group. Social support was found to be the sole predictor of intimacy and conflict levels in the control sample. However in the ambulance group, social support was predictive of intimacy levels, rational-cognitive strategies were predictive of conflict levels, and self-care, social support, and rational-cognitive strategies were all significantly correlated with the three dimensions of family functioning.