Patents for Intangible Inventions in Australia After Grant v Commissioner of Patents (Part 1)
McEniery, Benjamin J. (2007) Patents for Intangible Inventions in Australia After Grant v Commissioner of Patents (Part 1). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 13(2), pp. 70-74.
An issue currently attracting attention in a number of jurisdictions is the patentability of ‘pure’ business methods, which are business methods that do not involve a physical aspect. This issue was dealt with recently in Australia by the Full Court of the Federal Court which considered the patentability of a method of protecting an asset from the claims of creditors.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||Part 2 appears in volume 13(3) of the same journal|
|Keywords:||Patent, Patentability, Intangible, Physicality, Physical Aspect, Patentable Subject Matter, Inventions, Australia, Grant, Grant v Commissioner of Patents|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2007 Benjamin McEniery|
|Copyright Statement:||For more information, please contact the author firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Deposited On:||18 Apr 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:33|
Repository Staff Only: item control page