Accurate placement of a pelvic binder improves reduction of unstable fractures of the pelvic ring

Bonner, T. J., Eardley, W. G. P., Newell, N., Masouros, S., Matthews, J. J., Gibb, I., & Clasper, J. C. (2011) Accurate placement of a pelvic binder improves reduction of unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. The Bone & Joint Journal, 93-B(11), pp. 1524-1528.

View at publisher

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of placement of pelvic binders and to determine whether circumferential compression at the level of the greater trochanters is the best method of reducing a symphyseal diastasis. Patients were identified by a retrospective review of all pelvic radiographs performed at a military hospital over a period of 30 months. We analysed any pelvic radiograph on which the buckle of the pelvic binder was clearly visible. The patients were divided into groups according to the position of the buckle in relation to the greater trochanters: high, trochanteric or low. Reduction of the symphyseal diastasis was measured in a subgroup of patients with an open-book fracture, which consisted of an injury to the symphysis and disruption of the posterior pelvic arch (AO/OTA 61-B/C). We identified 172 radiographs with a visible pelvic binder. Five cases were excluded due to inadequate radiographs. In 83 (50%) the binder was positioned at the level of the greater trochanters. A high position was the most common site of inaccurate placement, occurring in 65 (39%). Seventeen patients were identified as a subgroup to assess the effect of the position of the binder on reduction of the diastasis. The mean gap was 2.8 times greater (mean difference 22 mm) in the high group compared with the trochanteric group (p < 0.01). Application of a pelvic binder above the level of the greater trochanters is common and is an inadequate method of reducing pelvic fractures and is likely to delay cardiovascular recovery in these seriously injured patients.

Impact and interest:

20 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™
13 citations in Web of Science®

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 70195
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Additional Information: Articles free to read on journal website after 5 years
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B11.27023
ISSN: 2049-4394
Divisions: Current > Schools > School of Chemistry, Physics & Mechanical Engineering
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Science & Engineering Faculty
Copyright Owner: ©2011 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
Deposited On: 15 Apr 2014 05:37
Last Modified: 22 Jan 2015 05:36

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page