Court stands firm on disclosure via subpoena

Jackson, Sheryl (2014) Court stands firm on disclosure via subpoena. Proctor, 34(3), pp. 50-51.


In Elders Rural Services Australia Ltd v Gooden [2014] QDC 22 Reid DCJ considered the interaction of the procedures under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld)relating to disclosure by parties to a proceeding and the subpoena process, in the context of a proceeding commenced by originating application.

Impact and interest:

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 70500
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Additional URLs:
Keywords: UCPR r416, subpoena for production, proceeding commenced by originating application, subpoena returnable before trial, attempt to obtain disclosure
ISSN: 1321-8794
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
Deposited On: 28 Apr 2014 00:41
Last Modified: 28 Apr 2014 22:29

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page