Reasoning paradigms in legal decision support systems

Zeleznikow, John & Hunter, Dan (1995) Reasoning paradigms in legal decision support systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 9(6), pp. 361-385.

View at publisher


In this paper we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of a range of artificial intelligence approaches used in legal domains. Symbolic reasoning systems which rely on deductive, inductive and analogical reasoning are described and reviewed. The role of statistical reasoning in law is examined, and the use of neural networks analysed. There is discussion of architectures for, and examples of, systems which combine a number of these reasoning strategies. We conclude that to build intelligent legal decision support systems requires a range of reasoning strategies.

Impact and interest:

4 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 71068
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
DOI: 10.1007/BF00849064
ISSN: 1573-7462
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Copyright Owner: Copyright 1995 Springer Netherlands
Deposited On: 06 May 2014 03:54
Last Modified: 21 Jun 2017 05:01

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page