Freedom to choose? Embryo selection, reproductive decision-making and the role of the state
Bennett, Belinda & Karpin, Isabel (2008) Freedom to choose? Embryo selection, reproductive decision-making and the role of the state. Precedent, 88, pp. 4-8.
Involving the biopsy of an eight-cell embryo, PGD has been hailed as a means of making reproductive decisions without having to face the heart-wrenching decision to abort an affected foetus. However, controversy around the kinds of traits for which testing can be done, and who has access to the technology, has led to questions about the way in which the technology is developing. Women who are allowed to access in vitro fertilisation (IVF) services can currently also access PGD in limited circumstances.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Bioethics; In vitro fertilisation; Australia: Law and legislation; Reproduction (Biological); National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). Australian Health Ethics Committee;|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2008 Australian Lawyers Alliance|
|Deposited On:||08 May 2014 03:14|
|Last Modified:||04 Feb 2015 05:28|
Repository Staff Only: item control page