Worldwide Occupational Road Safety (WORS) review project
Murray, Will (2007) Worldwide Occupational Road Safety (WORS) review project.
Occupational road safety has grown in importance in recent years as the extent of the
problem has emerged, and increasing numbers of researchers, practitioners and government
agencies have become interested in it. One example is the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the USA, which has undertaken a great deal of work to understand and improve the safety of workers. NIOSH has identified that one of the biggest risks that workers face is using the road, and as a result has focused a great deal of attention on occupational road safety.
The aims of NIOSH in sponsoring this particular project were two-fold:
1. Contribute to its research program on occupational road safety.
2. Facilitate the enhancement of global workplace safety and health.
In meeting these aims a literature review (Chapter 2) was undertaken. Contact was then made
with a range of participants from 15 countries around the world, all of whom completed a
questionnaire and provided a range of other information (Chapter 3). Two main gaps emerged
in the participants group: mainland European and less developed countries. Both should be
encouraged to take part in any future follow-on projects.
A large number of findings emerged from the project, which are summarised below.
• Where data on the extent of the occupational road crashes is available, it accounts for
a significant proportion of both road and workplace fatalities and injuries. This
suggests that more attention should be given to the issue by both transport and
occupational safety and health-based agencies.
• Good quality ‘purpose of journey’ information should urgently be included in the road
safety data collection processes in many participant countries to allow at-work
collisions in smaller vehicles such as cars and vans to be identified, as well as those in
larger vehicles. Based on recent experiences in the UK, this requires a detailed
briefing and training program for the police officers who collect the data at the front
• Occupational safety and health (OSH) data and responsibility encompass on-road
driving incidents in some countries, but not in others. There is a strong argument for
OSH agencies to undertake more data capture, leadership and enforcement on
occupational road safety, which appears to be one of the major at-work risks in many
• Other data sets, including workers’ compensation, insurance, coronial records and
hospital admissions also hint at the scale of the problem, but there was no obvious
sharing of data standards between participant countries.
• Currently, only limited data linkages exist, for example, between road safety statistics
and hospital admissions, or between health and safety or insurance data. Better
linkages via common coding and interagency collaboration would enable a more
complete picture to be obtained.
• Governments themselves are one of the largest purchasers of vehicles in many regions
around the world, and should be seen to lead by example in the effective and safe
management of their own vehicles and drivers. Publishing highly detailed case-studybased
program evaluations should be a key element of this process. At present there
are many public and private sector programs, but few have been effectively evaluated
and documented in detail.
• An important next step should be to organise an international conference on
occupational road safety that brings together researchers, policy makers, key
government agencies, industry practitioners and other stakeholders to agree on
definitions, share best practice and guide future actions including leadership on a
larger collaborative project to be led by a well-resourced research group to explore
and compare the available data and processes around the world.
Overall, the extent on the occupational road safety problem identified suggests that focusing some time and investment of the recommendations in the report would be a very good use of road safety, OSH and business improvement research and project management resources.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
Repository Staff Only: item control page