Practice & procedure : disclosure obligations - Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 s27
Jackson, Sheryl (2007) Practice & procedure : disclosure obligations - Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 s27. Proctor, 27(7), pp. 57-58.
In Huag v Jupiters Limited  QCA 199 the Queensland Court of Appeal allowed an appeal from interlocutory orders made in the trial division of the court and concluded that, although provisions such as s27 of the Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld) should be given a broad, remedial construction, this did not mean the words of limitation in the section could be ignored.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002, disclosure of documents, extent of obligation to disclose|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Deposited On:||15 May 2014 04:00|
|Last Modified:||17 Jun 2014 05:14|
Repository Staff Only: item control page