An analysis of ranking principles and retrieval strategies
Zuccon, Guido, Azzopardi, Leif, & Rijsbergen, C.J. Keith (2011) An analysis of ranking principles and retrieval strategies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science : Advances in Information Retrieval Theory, 6931, pp. 151-163.
The assumptions underlying the Probability Ranking Principle (PRP) have led to a number of alternative approaches that cater or compensate for the PRP’s limitations. All alternatives deviate from the PRP by incorporating dependencies. This results in a re-ranking that promotes or demotes documents depending upon their relationship with the documents that have been already ranked. In this paper, we compare and contrast the behaviour of state-of-the-art ranking strategies and principles. To do so, we tease out analytical relationships between the ranking approaches and we investigate the document kinematics to visualise the effects of the different approaches on document ranking.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||Book Subtitle:
Third International Conference, ICTIR 2011, Bertinoro, Italy, September 12-14, 2011. Proceedings
|Keywords:||Ranking principles, Information retrieval, Document ranking|
|Divisions:||Current > Schools > School of Information Systems
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Science & Engineering Faculty
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2011 Springer|
|Copyright Statement:||The original publication is available at SpringerLink
|Deposited On:||01 Jun 2014 23:26|
|Last Modified:||21 Jul 2014 19:23|
Repository Staff Only: item control page