Practice and Procedure - offers to settle - no costs benefit if no compromise

Jackson, Sheryl (2005) Practice and Procedure - offers to settle - no costs benefit if no compromise. Proctor, 25(5), pp. 41-42.


In Jones v Millward [2005]QCA76 the Queensland Court of Appeal held that an offer to settle under the UCPR will not attract a costs benefit unless it involves some element of compromise

Impact and interest:

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 72624
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: No
Additional URLs:
Keywords: UCPR, offers to settle, beneficial costs consequences, must involve element of compromise
ISSN: 1321-8794
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2005 The author
Deposited On: 05 Jun 2014 22:48
Last Modified: 18 Jun 2014 01:56

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page