Practice and Procedure - offers to settle - no costs benefit if no compromise
Jackson, Sheryl (2005) Practice and Procedure - offers to settle - no costs benefit if no compromise. Proctor, 25(5), pp. 41-42.
In Jones v Millward QCA76 the Queensland Court of Appeal held that an offer to settle under the UCPR will not attract a costs benefit unless it involves some element of compromise
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||UCPR, offers to settle, beneficial costs consequences, must involve element of compromise|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2005 The author|
|Deposited On:||05 Jun 2014 22:48|
|Last Modified:||18 Jun 2014 01:56|
Repository Staff Only: item control page