Default judgment - whether irregular - whether court has residual discretion not to set aside default judgment irregularly entered
Jackson, Sheryl (2006) Default judgment - whether irregular - whether court has residual discretion not to set aside default judgment irregularly entered. Proctor, 26(3), pp. 39-40.
In CB Richard Ellis (C) Pty Ltd v Wingate Properties Pty Ltd  QDC 399 McGill DCJ examined whether the court now has a discretion to set aside an irregularly entered default judgment.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||UCPR, setting aside default judgment, whether court has discretion not to set aside irregularly entered default judgment|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2006 The author|
|Deposited On:||05 Jun 2014 22:33|
|Last Modified:||05 Jun 2014 22:35|
Repository Staff Only: item control page