Disclosure of documents : by duty, court order, or beyond reach?
Jackson, Sheryl (2002) Disclosure of documents : by duty, court order, or beyond reach? The Queensland Lawyer, 22(4), pp. 120-122.
The article examines the decision in Erskine v McDowall  QDC 192, where the Court considered an application for an order that the defendant disclose documents to which she had a right of access under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth).
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||disclosure of documents, right of access under Freedom of Information legislation, whether documents within defendant's 'control'|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2002 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Limited|
|Deposited On:||29 Jun 2014 22:45|
|Last Modified:||29 Jun 2014 22:45|
Repository Staff Only: item control page