Attrition in Child Sexual Assault Cases: Why Lord Chief Justice Hale Got It Wrong
Successful criminal prosecutions for sexual offences against children are more difficult to secure than for any other offence. Sexual assault defendants are less likely than other defendants to plead guilty, less likely to proceed to trial, and more likely to be acquitted. Nevertheless, four centuries after Lord Hale expressed the view that accusations of rape are easily made and hard to refute, the adage is still repeated as though it were established truth in contemporary court decisions and by 21st century lawyers. While there is widespread agreement in the research literature about the entrenched difficulties in child sexual assault cases, the underlying reasons for the low conviction rate are less well understood. It is argued that socio-legal, systemic and child-related factors may contribute to the high attrition rate in child sexual assault cases. The need for further research is discussed.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Criminal Law and Procedure (180110)|
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Social Change Research|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2006 Thomson Legal & Regulatory|
|Copyright Statement:||Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.|
|Deposited On:||08 May 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:23|
Repository Staff Only: item control page