Improved prediction of bacterial transcription start sites
Gordon, John J., Towsey, Michael W., Hogan, James M., Mathews, Sarah A., & Timms, Peter (2006) Improved prediction of bacterial transcription start sites. Bioinformatics, 22(2), pp. 142-148.
Abstract
Motivation:
Identifying bacterial promoters is an important step toward understanding gene regulation. In this paper, we address the problem of predicting the location of promoters and their transcription start sites (TSSs) in Escherichia coli. The accepted method for this problem is to use position weight matrices (PWMs), which define conserved motifs at the sigma-factor binding site. However this method is known to result in a large numbers of false positive predictions.
Results:
Our approaches to TSS prediction are based upon an ensemble of support vector machines (SVMs) employing a variant of the mismatch string kernel. This classifier is sub-sequently combined with a PWM and a model based on distribution of distances from TSS to gene start. We investi-gate the effect of different scoring techniques and quantify performance using area under a detection-error tradeoff curve. When tested on a biologically realistic task, our method provides performance comparable or superior to the best reported for this task. False positives are significantly reduced, an improvement of great significance to biologists.
Citations:
Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page