Asset management policies and guidelines of different states in Australia : a comparative analysis

Nateque Mahmood, Muhammad, Subas Prasad, Dhakal, Brown, Kerry, Keast, Robyn, & Wiewiora, Anna (2014) Asset management policies and guidelines of different states in Australia : a comparative analysis. Journal of Facilities Management, 12(3), pp. 286-302.

View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore and compare the asset management policies and practices of six Australian states – New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Tasmania – to improve understanding of the policy context to best shape policy focus and guidelines. Australian state-wide asset management policies and guidelines are an emergent policy domain, generating a substantial body of knowledge. However, these documents are spread across the layers of government and are therefore largely fragmented and lack coherency.

Design/methodology/approach The comparative study is based on the thematic mapping technique using the Leximancer software.

Findings Asset management policies and guidelines of New South Wales and Victoria have more interconnected themes as compared to other states in Australia. Moreover, based on the findings, New South Wales has covered most of the key concepts in relation to asset management; the remaining five states are yet to develop a comprehensive and integrated approach to asset management policies and guidelines.

Research limitations/implications This review and its findings have provided a number of directions on which government policies can now be better constructed and assessed. In doing so, the paper contributes to a coherent way forward to satisfy national emergent and ongoing asset management challenges. This paper outlines a rigorous analytical methodology to inform specific policy changes.

Originality/value This paper provides a basis for further research focused on analyzing the context and processes of asset management guidelines and policies.

Impact and interest:

1 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 75801
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: Content Analysis, Australia, Asset Management, Community Involvement, Leximancer
DOI: 10.1108/JFM-03-2013-0017
ISSN: 1472-5967
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (150300) > Organisation and Management Theory (150310)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
Deposited On: 31 Aug 2014 23:21
Last Modified: 22 Jun 2017 12:03

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page