‘Structuring’ judicial sentencing discretion : consistency, guidance or pandering to the punitive?

Stobbs, Nigel, Kleinau, Lisa, & Kolstad, Shelley (2014) ‘Structuring’ judicial sentencing discretion : consistency, guidance or pandering to the punitive? Alternative Law Journal, 39(2), pp. 156-158.

[img] pending for publisher permission (PDF 57kB)
Accepted Version.
Administrators only | Request a copy from author

View at publisher


Until quite recently, most Australian jurisdictions gave statutory force to the principle of imprisonment as a sanction of last resort, reflecting its status as the most punitive sentencing option open to the court.1 That principle gave primary discretion as to whether incarceration was the most appropriate means of achieving the purpose of a sentence to the sentencing court, which received all of the information relevant to the offence, the offender and any victim(s). The disestablishment of this principle is symptomatic of an increasing erosion of judicial discretion with respect to sentencing, which appears to be resulting in some extremely punitive consequences.

Impact and interest:

0 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 76087
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: mandatory sentences, Queensland
ISSN: 1037-969X
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY (160000) > CRIMINOLOGY (160200) > Courts and Sentencing (160203)
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Crime & Justice Research Centre
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2014 Legal Service Bulletin Co-operative Ltd
Deposited On: 09 Sep 2014 22:54
Last Modified: 22 Jun 2017 14:02

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page